2023 Asset management industry key takeaways and preparing for 2024 | Baker Tilly

Have questions about the Moss Adams combination? We're here to help. Submit your inquiry.

Loading...

2023 Asset management industry key takeaways and preparing for 2024 | Baker Tilly

Carried interest:

IRC Section 1061, introduced by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) in 2017, recharacterized certain net long-term capital gains as short-term capital gains for partners holding applicable partnership interests (APIs). This provision affects the tax treatment of carried interests in hedge funds, private equity, and other investment partnerships.

Exemption from 3-year holding with strict substantiation
Partnership agreements may need to be updated in 2024
K-1 white paper detail reflecting carry and capital allocations should be tracked separately
The IRS has explicitly stated that if long-term gains aren’t specifically reported with this split, all long-term gains will be treated as short-term gains

State tax updates

Alabama is phasing out Business Privilege Tax (BPT) cutting it down from $100 to $50. By 2024, this tax will be completely gone.
New York the business capital tax, which was originally set to phase out at the end of 2023, will now be phased out on Jan. 1, 2027 instead.
North Carolina is making some changes to the net worth base and investments held by limited partnerships versus limited liability companies. They’re adding a $1 million backout to the net worth base, and this will start from Jan 1, 2025.
Oklahoma repealed the corporate franchise tax; this will be effective for the 2024 franchise tax year.
Tennessee they’re introducing a $500,000 franchise tax exclusion for the tax year 2024. Also, they’re moving to a single sales factor, which will be fully effective for tax years ending on or after December 31, 2025.
Texas is increasing the no tax due threshold to $2.47M for reports due in 2024, up from $1.23M in 2023.

Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET)

In response to this limitation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, many states have enacted laws allowing pass-through entities (PTEs), such as partnerships and S corporations, to elect to pay SALT at the entity level.

Proposed updates to partnership agreements:

Need for special allocation provisions: Special allocation provisions are crucial in partnership agreements as they provide a framework for distributing profits and losses among partners. They allow for flexibility and can be tailored to the specific needs of the partnership.
Designation of election: It’s important to designate who makes the election and whether they can choose not to make the election ensuring clarity and avoiding potential disputes.
Implementation of special allocation: The partnership agreement should include a provision that reduces cash entitlement correspondingly when a special allocation is implemented.
Designation of special allocation determinations: The agreement should clearly designate who makes special allocation determinations, which will help in maintaining transparency and accountability.
Definition of tax: The agreement should define the tax — PTET subject to special allocation versus PTET not subject to special allocation.
Estimates and reduction of current year draw accounts: Helps in managing the cash flow of the partnership.
True up reduction in cash following year end: Allows the partners’ capital accounts to be accurately reflected.
Recoupment with respect to withdrawing partner: Protects the interests of the remaining partners.
Adjustments to guaranteed payment partners: Ensures that the partners are compensated fairly for their contributions.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) updates

During 2023, the IRS trained over 100 individuals on technical aspects of subchapter K, and they plan on using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool to look at returns and issue notices starting with large partnerships. Notices will begin being sent starting in Oct.

The IRS has key focuses on their areas of enforcement including:

Sales and other dispositions of partnership interests
Distribution in excess of partner’s basis
Partnership losses in excess of partner’s basis
Self-Employment Contributions Act (SECA) tax: Whether limited partners and members of LLCs and LLPs should be subject to self-employment tax
High-income non-filers – this will be determined by tracing Schedules K-1s and other information returns.
Offshore Lending as a US Trade or Business (Financial services entities engaged in a U.S. trade or business).
Transfer pricing adjustments on related party loans and other controlled transactions (IRC 482).
Reconciliation of beginning to prior year ending balance sheet balances

Soroban Capital Partners, LP v. Commissioner

Last week, the tax court made a significant ruling in the case of Soroban Capital Partners, L.P. v. Commissioner. The court ruled that limited partners in the hedge fund could be subject to self-employment tax on their distributive share of partnership net income if they are actively involved.

Background The Self Employment Contributions Act (SECA) defines “self-employment income” as net earnings from self-employment. However, Section 1402(a)(13) excludes the distributive share of any item of income or loss of a limited partner. The Soroban limited partnership filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that its limited partners’ distributive shares should be excluded from self-employment income.
IRS argument The IRS disagreed with Soroban’s argument, stating that a functional analysis was necessary to determine whether the limited partner was an “active” limited partner that would not benefit from the exception.
Tax court ruling After analyzing the legislative history of Section 1402(a)(13) exception, the controversial 1997 proposed Treasury Regulations, and previous tax court cases. The court concluded that the exception does not apply to a partner “who is limited in name only” and who is not actually functioning as a passive investor.
Implications The Soroban ruling follows several cases in which the IRS has successfully challenged the application of the limited partner exception by active owners of various types of passthrough entities. However, this is the first time a court has ruled on whether an active limited partner of a state-law limited partnership can claim the limited partner exception.
Conclusion The Soroban ruling has significant implications for limited partners who are actively involved in their partnerships. It underscores the importance of understanding the roles and activities of limited partners in determining their tax obligations