Exchanging cryptocurrency for other cryptocurrency
Taxpayers commonly used to ask the question whether cryptocurrency exchanged for other cryptocurrency without USD ever received was a taxable event. The short answer is yes, the IRS appears to view these exchanges as taxable events.
IRC Section 1031, known as the like-kind exchange rules, used to apply to real and personal property, however, the rules changed in 2018 to apply only to real property. Real property is land or any permanent fixtures attached to that land; personal property isn’t permanently affixed to either.
Even before the updated rules, it was considered an aggressive approach to apply them to cryptocurrency. Now that they’re only allowed for real property, it’s clear a taxpayer can’t utilize Section 1031 to defer a crypto-to-crypto exchange.
Mining cryptocurrency
IRS Notice 2014-21, IRS Virtual Currency Guidance, states that taxpayers earn taxable income when they receive a block reward of virtual convertible currency for successfully mining a new block on the blockchain.
The taxable income earned is the determinable fair market value (FMV) in U.S. dollars of the virtual convertible currency earned from the block reward. This income is considered ordinary income and the amount reportable is based on the FMV of the cryptocurrency at the time it was successfully mined.
Retirement-account investors interested in mining bitcoin — versus trading bitcoin — should be aware that such activity could be subject to the unrelated business taxable income tax rules if the mining is deemed a trade or business.
Paying for goods and services with cryptocurrency
IRS Notice 2014-21 Question four addresses how to treat virtual currency received as payment for goods or services.
IRS Notice 2014-21 Question six addresses whether gain or loss should be recognized when exchanging virtual currency for other property.
When a business receives cryptocurrency for services or as payment for goods, the business is required to recognize revenue when payment is received.
If a business receives one Bitcoin (BTC) valued at $20,000, and then two months later decides to use that BTC to pay for an expense when the BTC appreciated to $30,000, the company would need to recognize gain on the spread of $10,000 when the BTC is exchanged.
This can become a complicated scenario for companies that don’t have tracking in place to identify the original cost basis of the cryptocurrency being used. The complexity increases with the frequency of payments.
Hard forks and chains splits
The IRS drafted Revenue Rule 2019-24 to address whether a taxpayer has gross income under Section 61 as a result of a hard fork.
A hard fork, in simple terms, is when a single cryptocurrency splits in two. This occurs when a cryptocurrency’s existing code is changed, resulting in both an old and new digital asset. A hard fork requires all nodes or users to upgrade to the latest version of the protocol software simultaneously.
There are different ways a hard fork can play out, including:
- No new cryptocurrency. If you didn’t receive any new crypto, you therefore don’t have taxable income. It’s a protocol upgrade that doesn’t impact or change the property in the hands of the taxpayer. This is sometimes called a soft fork.
- New cryptocurrency. New crypto received is taxable ordinary income in the year received. The determination of receipt can be complicated.
Section 61 states that all gains or undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, over which a taxpayer has complete dominion, are included in gross income.
The Revenue Ruling focuses on two elements:
- Accessions to wealth. An increase in the value of property
- Complete dominion. This isn’t defined in the Revenue Ruling, but likely means the ability to exercise control over the new cryptocurrency.
A hard fork results in a new distributed ledger and a new cryptocurrency, even while the taxpayer still owns the legacy cryptocurrency. As a result, one ends up with an accession to wealth.
The IRS believes the new distributed ledger meets the accession to wealth requirement, and should include cryptocurrency received as a result of a hard fork as ordinary income.
However, if you’re supposed to receive cryptocurrency as a result of a hard fork but can’t access or control the new forked cryptocurrency, then it might not be taxable until you have access or control.
For example, if you had crypto on a Coinbase account and the newly forked coin wasn’t supported by Coinbase, you’re unable to access the new cryptocurrency.
In this scenario, it seems the IRS suggests it wouldn’t be a current taxable event. The key is whether you also have dominion, or control, over the cryptocurrency.
Donating cryptocurrency
The first step is to confirm that the charitable organization or charitable vehicle is a qualified 501(c)(3) charitable organization, and then confirm they’re able to receive cryptocurrency as a donation.
Your tax deduction will equal the fair market value of the donated bitcoin, assuming the property was held for more than one year. Rules for donating cryptocurrency would fall under the property limitations since the IRS treats cryptocurrency as property under IRS Notice 2014-21.
Note that for the purposes of this topic, we’re commenting only on donations directly to charitable organizations or donor-advised funds.
Decentralized finance (DeFi)
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is quite popular in the cryptospace. DeFi space includes platforms that allow users to utilize their crypto holdings to earn interest similar to peer-to-peer lending or earning interest on cash in a bank account.
Many questions pop up with regards to tax treatment of these new activities, including staking, yield farming, liquidity mining, and crypto lending.
Blockchain technology allows new platforms to pop-up, essentially eliminate banks, and connect users with large amounts of crypto to lend to various networks.
In return, they could be rewarded with more cryptocurrency. These rewards would likely be taxable assuming they meet both the accession to wealth and dominion requirements discussed earlier. What the character of the taxable event is and when it’s taxable is the more complex question.
Foreign reporting requirements
Taxpayers must file Financial crimes enforcement network (FinCEN) form 114, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, and Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, if reporting thresholds are met for cryptocurrency held in a foreign account.
For married joint filers, the thresholds for FinCEN Form 114 are an aggregate value of $10,000 or more at any point during the year, and the reporting threshold for Form 8938 is either an aggregate value of:
- $100,000 or more on the last day of the year
- $150,000 or more at any point during the calendar year
The FinCEN Form 114 is a standalone filing while the Form 8938 is filed with an individual’s tax return. Both forms are due by April 15, with the option to extend until Oct. 15.
Why can’t cryptocurrency exchanges provide accurate tax forms?
The biggest reason cryptocurrency exchanges can’t provide tax reporting information is likely the fact that they simply aren’t required to and considered outside the traditional brokerage reporting requirements.
Some larger crypto exchanges are proactive and provide reporting information on crypto transaction including Robinhood and Coinbase.
