Article
What does name, image and likeness look like one year later?
June 30, 2022 · Authored by Katlyn Andrews, Kyra Castano
A year ago, effective July 1, 2021, all three divisions of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) adopted an interim policy suspending preexisting name, image, and likeness (NIL) rules. While there is currently no federal law governing NIL, legislation has passed in more than half of the states.
In the past twelve months, student athletes, businesses and higher education institutions have played a role in the evolution of NIL, but at what cost?
Student athletes
Student athletes are now able to profit from the use of their NIL without jeopardizing their eligibility to compete at the NCAA level. According to data published by Opendorse, a collegiate athletics technology company, most student athletes cashing in on their NIL are doing so by posting content on social media. Using social media, student athletes have become influencers and spokespeople for small businesses, national brands and even politicians.
While additional income earned through NIL opportunities may be helpful, athletes must consider the impact these earnings may have on their federal financial aid packages as well as federal and state tax bills. These are not topics with which student athletes are often very familiar. According to the NCAA’s Fall 2021 Student-Athlete Well-Being Survey, when planning for the future, student athletes indicated a need for educational resources on tax and financial literacy (49%), career planning (47%), navigating NIL opportunities (40%) and professional opportunities in sport (37%).
The focus on NIL opportunities, in addition to the societal pressures and personal traumas that student athletes may be facing, can have an adverse impact on student athlete mental health. NIL deals have the potential to create conflicts between teammates and other priorities (e.g., coursework) and cause additional stress.
