Article
Transforming research universities for the 21st century: Adapting to a new federal compact
Jun 30, 2025 · Authored by Daniel Greenstein
Academic research will continue powerfully into the 21st century, driving innovation, economic growth and solutions to humanity's greatest challenges. But make no mistake—the operating and business models that have sustained research universities for the past half-century must transform dramatically to achieve this objective. The question is not whether research will thrive, but how universities will adapt their structures, partnerships and approaches to ensure it does.
The catalyst: A changing federal compact
The immediate catalyst for this transformation lies in the federal budget expected to pass in the coming weeks. After more than 50 years of robust partnership between the federal government and research universities, we're witnessing a fundamental shift in this compact that will reshape the research enterprise in profound ways.
The changes are threefold and significant. First, major research funding agencies—the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF)—face substantial budget cuts, reducing the overall pool of available research funding. Second, and perhaps more disruptive, federal reimbursement rates for research grants are expected to plummet to as low as 15 percent. These overhead rates, which universities negotiate individually and which currently range up to 60 percent or more at some institutions, provide crucial "disposable" funding that supports activities across the entire university enterprise. Third, potential reductions in international student visas threaten to diminish the graduate student population that forms the backbone of university research—international students comprise roughly 25 percent of all graduate students.
The immediate impacts are predictable. Universities will follow the money, shifting research focus toward areas where funding remains available. If NIH and NSF funding contracts while Department of Defense research funding remains stable, we'll see research portfolios realign accordingly. The subject areas and lines of inquiry that define university research will increasingly reflect funding availability rather than purely intellectual curiosity or societal need.
Beyond the federal budget: Systemic pressures
Yet the federal budget changes, while catalytic, represent just one layer of pressure on an already strained system. Research universities operate as remarkably complex organizations comprising multiple, intensively interdependent business lines and cost centers that have historically cross-subsidized one another. This model has been a source of strength, allowing robust parts of the enterprise to support weaker ones through difficult periods.
Consider the typical cross-subsidies: undergraduate programs supported not only by tuition and state appropriations, but by profits from residence halls and dining services; graduate students funded through research grants who reduce instructional costs by taking over faculty teaching loads; overhead from research grants supporting administrative functions across the university. These interdependencies create a web of mutual support that has enabled universities to weather various storms.
But in times of protracted decline across multiple areas simultaneously, these same interdependencies become a source of vulnerability. When enrollment drops, residence halls and dining services lose revenue, reducing their ability to subsidize academics. When research funding contracts, fewer graduate students are available to teach, forcing higher-cost faculty back into classrooms. The very interconnectedness that provided resilience now threatens to create downward spirals where weakness in one area drags down others.
Adding to these pressures is the changing economics of graduate student labor. Universities have long relied on graduate students as lower-cost teaching assistants, freeing faculty for research while maintaining instructional capacity at reduced expense. However, graduate students have increasingly organized into collective bargaining units, successfully negotiating significantly improved wages and benefits. This evolution, while positive for graduate students, fundamentally alters the cost structure that has sustained the research enterprise.
Meanwhile, artificial intelligence (AI) looms as another transformative force. While we must avoid overhyping AI's current capabilities, we can envision a future where the nature and scale of human engagement in research changes dramatically. Advanced computing power and emerging robotic capabilities could enable sophisticated research with far fewer human researchers than currently required. The same technological forces that enable remote surgery across continents could revolutionize how research is conducted, potentially reducing both the personnel and physical infrastructure traditionally required.
A road map for transformation
These challenges, while formidable, are entirely surmountable. Universities have successfully adapted to massive changes before, and the tools and models needed for this transformation already exist. The key lies in embracing proven strategies that other institutions have used effectively under financial pressure.
Operational excellence
Research universities must become ruthlessly efficient in their back-office operational functions. Research universities are large, complex institutions. They often maintain redundant administrative structures across multiple departments. Basic functions like payroll, human resources, institutional research, facilities management and procurement must be centralized or delivered through shared services. The operational models that less well-endowed institutions have used for years out of necessity must now be embraced by research universities that have historically been insulated from such pressures.
Academic program optimization
With fewer graduate students available and higher instructional costs as faculty return to classrooms, universities must carefully examine the breadth of their academic offerings. While not every program must generate profit individually, the collective portfolio must achieve financial sustainability. Some institutions will discover they've become overly broad, maintaining too many programs with too few students and insufficient revenue sources. Painful but necessary rationalization of academic program arrays will become essential, requiring difficult conversations with faculty about which programs can be sustained.
Research portfolio focus
Similarly, research portfolios must become more focused and strategic. As funding becomes more concentrated in specific areas, universities cannot afford to maintain extensive cross-subsidies for research areas that cannot sustain themselves through grant funding. However valuable certain research may be from a societal perspective, economic realities will force difficult choices about which areas can be supported without undermining the institution's overall viability.
Shared research infrastructure
Perhaps most fundamentally, universities must rethink the traditional model of research infrastructure. The historical approach—building dedicated labs, libraries and facilities for each new research area or faculty hire—is becoming economically unsustainable. Instead, research capabilities must increasingly operate as shared services, with multiple departments, faculty members and even multiple universities sharing expensive equipment, facilities and specialized staff.
Artificial intelligence and internet technologies enable much of this sharing through remote access capabilities. Rather than every research department maintaining its own specialized facilities, we can envision shared research infrastructure that serves multiple institutions, leveraging technology to provide access without requiring physical presence.
Public-private partnerships
Universities must also cultivate new funding partnerships, particularly with corporate America. Before massive federal research investments, companies like GE and Bell Labs maintained world-class research facilities. As federal funding contracts, we may see a renaissance of corporate research partnerships and new business models surrounding university research.
These public-private partnerships (known as “P3s”) need not represent entirely new territory. Universities already engage in P3s for real estate development, energy solutions and other functions. The challenge lies in extending these models to research activities while maintaining academic integrity and mission alignment.
Some universities may develop arm's-length organizational relationships with their research enterprises, similar to how many institutions have restructured their athletics programs or hospital systems in response to changing business models. Such arrangements could provide the flexibility needed to engage corporate partners while preserving core academic values.
Reason for optimism
These transformations, while challenging, build on existing capabilities and proven models. Universities know how to implement operational efficiencies, shared services and P3s. The road maps and playbooks exist; the obstacle lies in applying them systematically across the research enterprise.
Moreover, higher education has demonstrated remarkable adaptability when circumstances demand it. The COVID-19 pandemic provided perhaps the most dramatic example: within weeks, universities transformed an intensively face-to-face enterprise into one operating entirely remotely, reconstructing every aspect of their operations without significant interruption. This rapid adaptation revealed the industry's fundamental capacity for change when necessity demands it.
The research enterprise faces a similarly transformative moment. While the established patterns of the past 50-70 years will change significantly, the fundamental mission—advancing knowledge, driving innovation and solving complex problems—remains as vital as ever. Universities that embrace these necessary transformations proactively will not only survive but position themselves to thrive in a new era of research excellence.
The federal budget changes represent a catalyst, not a catastrophe. They accelerate transformations that were already becoming necessary due to broader economic and technological forces. Universities that recognize this moment as an opportunity to build more sustainable, efficient and innovative research enterprises will emerge stronger and more capable of fulfilling their essential mission in the 21st century.
The future of university research is bright, but it will look markedly different from the past. Those institutions willing to transform their business models, embrace new partnerships, and leverage emerging technologies will continue to lead the world in advancing human knowledge and solving our most pressing challenges.
Baker Tilly can help
Our higher education team works with more than 130 research institutions and understands the unique challenges and actionable opportunities available to support your university’s mission. We can help your organizations on its road to transformation. Connect with us to learn more!
Please note: All views and opinions expressed are my own.
