As teams leverage advanced technology, seamless integrations and automated systems, the reliance on hands-off methodologies has grown. However, this increased productivity can create a false sense of security. It’s crucial to scrutinize these processes to uncover potential vulnerabilities.
Consider the following critical questions to identify areas of exposure:
- People-centric processes: Where do manual errors most frequently occur?
- Technology-centric processes: Which automated processes lack human oversight, potentially leading to data gaps or information discrepancies?
- Financial and fiduciary risks: With what processes are the largest risks associated?
- Outdated processes: Which processes haven’t been reevaluated for an extended period?
- Common complaints and errors: What are the recurring issues the HR operations team is addressing, and which processes are involved?
- Siloed work: What tasks are confined to individual resources?
By addressing these questions, organizations can better manage risks and ensure their HR processes are both efficient and secure. It’s critical that, as human resources (HR) leaders, we maintain awareness of potential exposures and align audit processes to combat these gaps. Internal audit processes are valuable for a variety of reasons. They can lead to objective insights, create opportunities for process improvement, help manage risks, improve efficiencies, and reduce errors that can lead to financial loss or non-compliance penalties.
The audit process includes identifying the procedure that will be audited and then drafting an audit plan to include timing, data sources, participants, levels of review, and report expectations. It is not uncommon for an audit plan to focus on a single procedure at the beginning of the process and then expand to include other concerns that should be addressed. Clearly defining objectives and expectations is central to a successful audit process.
HR leaders should consider proactively scrutinizing processes, including:

